Topic on Talk:Main Page
This page shows the changes between two versions of a post by GuyThatExists in the topic "Proposed Naming Convention Guide" on Talk:Main Page.
You can see other versions of this post at its history page.
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
3. Promotional Materials (websites, commercials, boxart) | 3. Promotional Materials (websites, commercials, boxart) | ||
| − | 4. | + | 4. Descriptive names of new entries in old species (i.e. Masked Bonobo, Green Baki) <small>edited to add this entry</small> |
| − | 5. Internal Documents (GDDs, leaks, etc.) | + | 5. Game files |
| + | |||
| + | 6. Internal Documents (GDDs, leaks, etc.) | ||
=== Conjecture === | === Conjecture === | ||
| − | + | 7. Popular fan names (i.e. Anchorpus, Fiora, Lambert) | |
| − | + | 8. Descriptive names (i.e. Baki Miner, Helmet Dragon) | |
Typically, 1. and 2. will overlap, but in the strange case where some villagers call Galactic Jungle "Space Jungle" and a RapoGirl mentions "Fortune", 1. should be prioritized. I would put 3. above both of those, but with a Teeter on the boxart of Two Realms (and my distrust of 505 with this franchise), it feels better suited under in-game things. 4. and 5. will also typically overlap, but Internal Documents typically use dev names for things, while the game files tend to be closer to the final names of entities. Once we leave the realm of internal documents, I feel like that's when we should start adding the "Article Conjecture" category to pages. | Typically, 1. and 2. will overlap, but in the strange case where some villagers call Galactic Jungle "Space Jungle" and a RapoGirl mentions "Fortune", 1. should be prioritized. I would put 3. above both of those, but with a Teeter on the boxart of Two Realms (and my distrust of 505 with this franchise), it feels better suited under in-game things. 4. and 5. will also typically overlap, but Internal Documents typically use dev names for things, while the game files tend to be closer to the final names of entities. Once we leave the realm of internal documents, I feel like that's when we should start adding the "Article Conjecture" category to pages. | ||
What do you guys think of this new system? It's going to me my methodology from here on out, and I plan on renaming some pages tomorrow to higher ranked names (i.e. Mecha Baki (6) --> Clockwork Baki (4) ), so please let me know if you guys have any suggestions. | What do you guys think of this new system? It's going to me my methodology from here on out, and I plan on renaming some pages tomorrow to higher ranked names (i.e. Mecha Baki (6) --> Clockwork Baki (4) ), so please let me know if you guys have any suggestions. | ||